COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AGENCY | |||
Date: |
April 10, 2002 | ||
Set Time: |
9:30 a.m. | ||
Hearing Date: |
April 16, 2002 | ||
To: |
Honorable Board of Supervisors | ||
From: |
Marcia Raines, Director of Environmental Services | ||
Subject: |
Addendum to Status Report: Appeal of Planning Commission's decision to approve a Coastal Development Permit, a Resource Management/Coastal Zone Permit and a Stable Permit to allow legalization of a 3-horse stable, tractor shed, agricultural barn, replacement of one 8,000-gallon water tank with two 5,000-gallon water tanks, and a mobile home as an affordable housing unit. The project is located at 1589 Higgins Canyon Road in the unincorporated Half Moon Bay area of San Mateo County. This project is appealable to the California Coastal Commission. | ||
County File Number: |
PLN 1999-00079 (Oscar Braun) | ||
BACKGROUND | |||
This is an addendum to our earlier report dated March 27, 2002. This project is a developing situation. Mr. Braun has retained an attorney, Ted Hannig, who now represents him in this matter. An inspection of the property was completed on April 2, and staff met with Mr. Hannig on April 9. In this report, we: (1) summarize the results of the inspection, and (2) outline the status of fees due. | |||
INSPECTION | |||
On April 2, 2002, County staff conducted an inspection of the above-referenced property. The owner, Mr. Braun, was absent at the time of inspection. His attorney, Ted Hannig, represented him. The inspection ran smoothly and was conducted without any problems. | |||
The table below outlines the findings of the inspection and provides possible remedies. |
Problem/Issue |
Possible Solution | ||
Structures Included in the Application for Legalization |
|||
3-horse stable |
Built without permit |
Applied for legalization | |
Two 5,000 gallon tanks |
Installed without permit |
Applied for legalization | |
Mobile Home (affordable housing unit) |
Installed without permit |
Applied for legalization | |
Tractor Shed |
Built without permit |
Applied for legalization | |
Agricultural Barn |
Built without permit |
Applied for legalization | |
Structures NOT Included in the Application for Legalization |
|||
Addition to the house (approximately 720 sq. ft.) |
A "top-story enclosure" added without permit. The original design and Assessor's records indicate this area of the building to be a small access tower to an open sun deck |
Include the addition in the application for legalization | |
Agricultural Well |
Agricultural well located 180 feet southwest of stable. Environmental Health Division has no record of permit issuance. Steel casing of this well indicates that it was installed before 1960. Well permits were not required until 1950. It is possible that the well may predate County requirements and be legal. The well appears to be in use and in good condition. |
Make a determination that the well predates County well requirements and hence is legal. | |
4-horse stable |
Application for legalization of stable included a 3-horse stable. Four horses were found on the property during inspection. |
Condition the project to limit total number of horses on the property to three. | |
Storage shed (126 sq. ft.) adjacent to stable |
Built without permit |
Include the shed in the application for legalization | |
Storage container (300 sq. ft.) adjacent to Tractor Shed |
Installed without permit |
Can either be conditioned to be removed or can be included in the application for legalization. | |
Septic and Water Supply Issues |
|||
Septic system for stable |
The illegally installed septic system for stable can meet County requirements if sewage is conducted to the system that serves the main house. Although stable is downhill from the main house, gravity drainage to the septic system is possible if the septic tank is buried deep enough. |
Legalization of septic system is part of the application. | |
Septic system for mobile home |
The illegally installed septic system does not meet the required 100-foot setback from the existing, permitted domestic well. |
Legalize the septic system by relocating the septic tank to meet all Environmental Health setback requirements. | |
Problem/Issue |
Possible Solution | ||
Water Supply for mobile home |
The existing domestic well was documented at 3.02 gallons a minute. This is not an adequate quantity of water to serve the mobile home (5.0 gallons a minute is required). |
Possible solutions include: | |
a. |
Retest the water quantity of the domestic well; | ||
b. |
Convert agricultural well to domestic well; | ||
c. |
Apply to drill additional domestic well. |
FEES |
Following is a revised summary of the application and investigation fees applicable to work at the Braun property, payments to date and amounts still due. It reflects: (1) payments discovered or received since our March 27 staff report, and (2) the application and investigation fees due for additional unpermitted work discovered during the April 2 inspection, should that work be incorporated into Mr. Braun's pending applications. |
Regarding fees paid, Mr. Hannig undertook a complete review of Mr. Braun's records in this matter and discovered a receipt for stable permit application and related fees paid in 1998. Staff was not aware of this payment because it had been recorded under an earlier case number and was never brought to our attention by Mr. Braun. The revised table reflects those payments. Also, on April 9, Mr. Hannig delivered a check in the amount of $1996.50, which, according to his calculations, was the balance due for application fees (not investigation fees) outlined in staff's February 11, 2002 letter to Mr. Braun. The letter accompanying Mr. Hannig's payment is attached. |
Staff's conclusion is that total application and investigation fees still due for all of the work outlined in the table in the preceding section of this report is $45,073.24. |
Type of Fees |
Permit Fee |
Investigation Fee |
Paid-to-Date |
Outstanding Balance | |||||
Building Permit Fees |
|||||||||
For Items Before April 2, 2002 Inspection | |||||||||
For Stable |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
475.20 |
(4,750) 3,000.001 |
|||||||
Electrical Fee |
36.00 |
360.00 |
|||||||
Plumbing Fee |
36.00 |
360.00 |
|||||||
For Mobile Home |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
500.00 |
N/A |
|||||||
Electrical Fee |
36.00 |
N/A |
|||||||
Plumbing Fee |
36.00 |
N/A |
|||||||
Types of Fees |
Permit Fee |
Investigation Fee |
Paid-to-Date |
Outstanding Balance | |||||
For Tractor Shed |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
811.80 |
(8,118) 3,000.001 |
|||||||
Electrical Fee |
36.00 |
360.00 |
|||||||
For Agricultural Barn |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
66.00 |
660.00 |
|||||||
For Water Tanks |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
198.00 |
1,980.00 |
|||||||
Plumbing Fee |
36.00 |
360.00 |
|||||||
For Items After April 2, 2002 Inspection | |||||||||
For Addition to the House |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
439.20 |
(4,750) 3,000.001 |
|||||||
Mechanical Fee |
108.00 |
1,080.00 |
|||||||
Electrical Fee |
108.00 |
1,080.00 |
|||||||
Plan Check Fee |
452.88 |
N/A |
|||||||
Road Mitigation Fee |
972.00 |
N/A |
|||||||
For Storage Shed Adjacent to Stable |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
41.58 |
411.58 |
|||||||
For Storage Container |
|||||||||
Filing Fee |
12.50 |
N/A |
|||||||
Building Permit Fee |
99.00 |
990.00 |
|||||||
Total Building Fees |
6,890.16 |
26,721.58 |
1,996.50 |
30,048.08 |
|||||
Planning Fees |
|||||||||
For Items Before April 2, 2002 Inspection | |||||||||
Coastal Development Permit -Public Hearing |
1,300.00 |
2,600.002 |
1,300.00 |
1,300.00 |
|||||
Resource Management Permit |
214.00 |
428.002 |
214.00 |
214.00 |
|||||
Stable Permit |
1,323.00 |
2,646.002 |
1,323.00 |
1,323.00 |
|||||
Initial Study and Negative Declaration |
833.00 |
1,666.002 |
833.00 |
833.00 |
|||||
Public Noticing |
52.00 |
104.002 |
52.00 |
52.00 |
|||||
For Items After April 2, 2002 Inspection | |||||||||
Amended Coastal Development Permit - Public Hearing |
6504 |
1,300.002 |
0.00 |
1,300.00 |
|||||
Amended Resource Management Permit |
1074 |
214.002 |
0.00 |
214.00 |
|||||
Revised Initial Study and Negative Declaration |
416.504 |
833.002 |
0.00 |
833.00 |
|||||
Types of Fees |
Permit Fee |
Investigation Fee |
Paid-to-Date |
Outstanding Balance | |||||
Environmental Health Fees |
|||||||||
Site Exam |
333.00 |
999.003 |
0.00 |
999.003 |
|||||
Soil Percolation Test |
607.00 |
1,821.003 |
0.00 |
1,821.003 |
|||||
Septic Permit for Mobile Home |
607.00 |
1,821.003 |
0.00 |
1,821.003 |
|||||
Well Construction Permit |
455.00 |
1,365.003 |
0.00 |
1,365.003 |
|||||
Well Certification Permit |
461.00 |
1,383.003 |
0.00 |
1,383.003 |
|||||
GRAND TOTAL |
$14,248.66 |
$36,543.08 |
$5,718.50 |
$45,073.24 |
|||||
1Investigation fees equal ten times building permit fee, plumbing fee and electrical fee but not to exceed $3,000 per trade. Per Section 9041, total fees for building violations are investigation fees in addition to the permit fees. | |||||||||
2All planning permit fees to be assessed two times the permit fee amount. | |||||||||
3All Environmental Health fees to be assessed three times the amount. | |||||||||
4Planning fees for amendment to permits assessed at one-half the permit fee. |
Please note that additional fees may be applicable for the following items: (1) building inspection fees as building permits approach finalization, and (2) environmental health fees for either conversion of agricultural well to domestic well or for a new domestic well. | ||
RESPONSE TO TED HANNIG'S LETTER DATED APRIL 9, 2002 | ||
1. |
Stable Permit and Confined Animal Ordinance | |
Mr. Hannig contends that the stable permit should be reviewed under the new Confined Animal Ordinance. The new Confined Animal Ordinance for the coastside is pending approval from the California Coastal Commission and, therefore, is not currently in effect. The stable operation, however, under the new regulations, would qualify for a certificate of exemption provided that the Coastal Commission makes no changes to the criteria for exemption. The Board could defer the action on the stable permit until such time as the Confined Animal Ordinance goes into effect. | ||
2. |
Investigation Fees | |
Mr. Hannig states that assessment of investigation fees is inappropriate because under the new Confined Animal Ordinance, it is his "understanding (and that of the Coastal Community) that pre-existing non-conforming uses and structures are subject to a 12-month amnesty program." | ||
Regarding non-conformities, the new Confined Animal Ordinance states that "if a structure was built in accordance with applicable County building regulations, but does not conform with the locational criteria and/or setback requirements, the structure may continue at its present location, and be repaired or upgraded to the extent allowed by the Zoning Regulation Chapter 4 - Zoning Nonconformities, unless the structure is shown to significantly degrade water quality or sensitive habitats, and adequate mitigation is not feasible." | ||
It maybe noted that the investigation fees calculated in the table above include fees not only for the stable structure but also for other structures, i.e. affordable housing unit, various accessory structures, and septic and water supply systems. Investigation fees levied are in accordance with the applicable County ordinances. The purpose, among other things, is to discourage construction and installation of unpermitted structures for the benefit of general public health and welfare and to compensate the County for additional expense involved in dealing with violations. | ||
3. |
Issues Raised by the Appellants | |
Mr. Hannig states that he feels confident that the issues raised by the appellants regarding a helipad, house square footage, night lighting and drainfield-to-well distance would be found to be non-issues after the inspection. | ||
The question of house square footage and drainfield-to-well distance are documented in the table summarizing findings of the inspection. The horse corral area (that does not require any building permits) could potentially be used as a helipad. If the applicants wish to use this area as a helipad, then they would need to apply for a separate permit. The project before the Board does not include approval of a helipad and would be conditioned accordingly. The exterior lighting of the structures was found to be in compliance with the applicable County regulations. | ||
OPTIONS | ||
The Board has two possible courses of action: | ||
1. |
Reach an agreement on fees due; direct the applicants to incorporate the additional items found during April 2 inspection into their application for legalization; and continue the item to allow time for resolution of pending issues. The project would be renoticed and rescheduled for a public hearing at a future date. | |
2. |
Deny the permits and direct staff and County Counsel to pursue abatement of all work done without permits. | |
ATTACHMENTS | ||
A. |
Warrant Return and Inventory. | |
B. |
April 9, 2002 Letter from Ted Hannig to Marcia Raines. | |
MDB:kcd - MDBM0586_WKU.DOC