|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
COUNTY OF SAN MATEOInter-Departmental Correspondence |
Department of Public Works |
|
DATE: |
May 9, 2002 |
BOARD MEETING DATE: |
May 21, 2002 |
|
TO: |
Honorable Board of Supervisors |
FROM: |
Neil R. Cullen, Director of Public Works |
SUBJECT: |
Construction of Valley Gutters and the Resurfacing of Harvard Avenue, County Road No. 966 - MidCoast Area (Project No. R8W01, F-116 [200-B]) |
|
Recommendation |
Adopt a resolution awarding and authorizing execution of a contract for the construction of valley gutters and the resurfacing of Harvard Avenue. |
|
Previous Board Action |
Adopted Resolution No. 65173 on April 2, 2002, adopting Plans and Specifications, determining prevailing wage scales, and calling for sealed proposals for the above referenced project. |
|
Discussion |
On April 30, 2002, bids were accepted for this project and subsequently referred to this office for checking and recommendation. The bids have been checked and the bid of: |
|
El Camino Paving, Inc. |
924 San Rafael Avenue |
Mountain View, CA 94043 |
|
at $209,570 was the lowest bid received. The Engineer's estimate was $263,000. A summary of the bids received is as follows: |
|
|
1. |
El Camino Paving, Inc. |
$ 209,570.00 |
|
|
2. |
Half Moon Bay Grading and Paving, Inc. |
$ 218,001.50 |
|
|
3. |
Interstate Grading and Paving, Inc. |
$ 218,153.30 |
|
|
4. |
Mc Guire and Hester |
$ 227,715.00 |
|
|
5. |
O'Grady Paving, Inc. |
$ 232,511.00 |
|
|
6. |
Esquivel Grading and Paving, Inc. |
$ 250,655.00 |
|
|
7. |
Graniterock Co. dba Pavex Construction Division |
$ 257,737.00 |
|
|
We have reviewed the contract documents and have determined that the affirmative action program of El Camino Paving, Inc. is in accordance with the current Affirmative Action Guidelines. |
|
Vision Alignment |
We believe our recommendation is consistent with the Shared Commitment to "Ensure Basic Health and Safety for All" and Goal Number 7 "Maintain and Enhance the Public Safety of All Residents and Visitors," as the project will maintain the riding quality of the road while improving the drainage in the area for the benefit of the adjacent property owners as well as the public. |
|
Fiscal Impact |
The total estimated cost of construction and contingencies is $230,000 which includes a ten percent (10%) contingency as the work is bid on a unit price basis (i.e., ton of asphalt placed, square yard of pavement fabric, etc.). The contingency is used to pay the contractor for any additional material placed as the actual tonnage used depends on the unit weight of the asphalt and the tolerances for the actual thickness of the pavement placed. |
|
Funds have been appropriated in the Road Fund to finance this work. There is no impact to the General Fund. |
|
A form of resolution has been approved by County Counsel. |