COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence | ||||||
Department of Public Works | ||||||
DATE: |
May 31, 2002 | |||||
BOARD MEETING DATE: |
June 25, 2002 | |||||
TO: |
Honorable Board of Supervisors | |||||
FROM: |
Neil R. Cullen, Director of Public Works | |||||
SUBJECT: |
Resurfacing of Louvaine Place, Louvaine Drive, Midway Avenue, Thornhill Drive, and portions of Stoneyford Drive, Sweetwood Drive, Garden Gateway, and Sullivan Avenue in Broadmoor Village (Project No. R8N01-F36 [71H]) | |||||
Recommendation | ||||||
Adopt a resolution awarding and authorizing execution of a contract for the resurfacing of the above referenced streets. | ||||||
Previous Board Action | ||||||
Adopted Resolution No. 65224 on April 30, 2002, adopting Plans and Specifications, determining prevailing wage scales, and calling for sealed proposals for the above referenced project. | ||||||
Discussion | ||||||
On May 28, 2002, bids were accepted for this project and subsequently referred to this office for checking and recommendation. The bids have been checked and the bid of: | ||||||
Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc. | ||||||
128 South Maple Avenue | ||||||
South San Francisco, CA 94080 | ||||||
at $ 298,442.50 was the lowest bid received. The Engineer's estimate was $360,000. A summary of the bids received is as follows: | ||||||
1. |
Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc. |
$298,442.50 |
||||
2. |
G. Bortolotto & Co., Inc. |
$309,482.25 |
||||
3. |
McGuire and Hester |
$314,805.00 |
||||
4. |
O'Grady Paving, Inc. |
$317,450.00 |
||||
5. |
C.F. Archibald Paving, Inc. |
$319,709.00 |
||||
6. |
Ghilotti Bros., Inc. |
$325,656.75 |
||||
7. |
Half Moon Bay Grading & Paving, Inc. |
$329,932.50 |
||||
8. |
Granite Rock |
$339,900.00 |
||||
9. |
Esquivel Grading & Paving, Inc. |
$351,894.50 |
||||
10. |
J.A. Gonsalves & Son Construction, Inc. |
$451,300.00 |
||||
We have reviewed the contract documents and have determined that the affirmative action program of Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc. is in accordance with the current Affirmative Action Guidelines. | ||||||
Vision Alignment | ||||||
We believe our recommendation is consistent with the Shared Commitment to "Ensure Basic Health and Safety for All" and Goal Number 7 "Maintain and Enhance the Public Safety of All Residents and Visitors," as it improves the conditions of these roads for the benefit of the public. | ||||||
Fiscal Impact | ||||||
The total estimated cost of construction and contingencies is $328,000, which includes a ten percent (10%) contingency as the work is bid on a unit price basis (i.e., ton of asphalt placed, square yard of pavement fabric, etc.). The contingency is used to pay the contractor for any additional material placed as the actual tonnage used depends on the unit weight of the asphalt and the tolerances for the actual thickness of the pavement placed. | ||||||
Funds have been appropriated in the Road Fund to finance this work. There is no impact to the General Fund. | ||||||
A form of resolution has been approved by County Counsel. |