|
|
|
|

|
COUNTY
OF SAN MATEO
Inter-Departmental
Correspondence
|
Environmental Services
Agency
|
|
DATE:
|
October 10, 2002
|
BOARD MEETING DATE:
|
October 29, 2002
|
SET TIME
|
9:00 a.m.
|
TO:
|
Honorable Board of Supervisors
|
FROM:
|
Marcia Raines, Director
|
SUBJECT:
|
Executive Summary: Review of Draft Mid-Coast
Recreational Needs Assessment
|
|
Proposal
|
Review the Draft Mid-Coast Recreational Needs
Assessment.
|
|
Recommendation
|
1.
|
Accept the Mid-Coast Recreational Needs Assessment;
and
|
2.
|
Consider establishment of a Task Force to study
the issues of governance and finance for how the Assessment will be implemented.
|
|
Summary |
The Mid-Coast
has been trying since the 1970's to implement a local neighborhood park plan.
Ongoing efforts have achieved some limited success, but a concerted effort is
required to make a system a reality. Following the Board of Supervisors approval
of the Coastside Subregional Planning Project, and a Mid-Coast Fiscal Annexation
Study in 1998, the Board of Supervisors requested that the Environmental Services
Agency, County Parks and Recreation Division initiate the Mid-Coast Recreational
Needs Assessment in the summer of 2000. The purpose of the Assessment is to assist
the Mid-Coast community in moving forward with a vision of a coastside park and
recreation system and outline a strategy for implementation of an overall plan.
The location of the Mid-Coast Recreational Needs Assessment is the unincorporated
Mid-Coast between City of Pacifica and Half Moon Bay. The east of inland boundary
used in this study is the same as used as the easterly Project Area Boundary used
in the Mid-Coast Local Coastal Plan Update Report 2002. Towards that end, the
Assessment will:
|
|
1.
|
Produce a needs assessment of desired park and
recreation elements.
|
2.
|
Provide the estimated costs of the park and recreation
system.
|
3.
|
Outline funding and opportunities for implementation
of the plan.
|
4.
|
Enable policy makers to implement an action plan.
|
|
Over the past 18 months, County Parks and Recreation
Division has been engaged in a community participation process that has included
two community meetings, a number of stakeholder interviews and analysis of the
census data for the Mid-Coast area. The County's Needs Analysis and Financing
Options Study scientifically measured community values and cited a strong level
of support at the current time. This is matched by the State's recent passage
of Proposition 12 and Proposition 40 yielding significant sources for local entities.
National Recreation and Park Association standards have been analyzed for Levels
of Service to determine need based on the current and projected populations and
related that to what is needed in the Mid-Coast area for current residents as
well projected out for the next 20 years.
|
|
During the Parks and Recreation Commission's consideration
of the Mid-Coast Recreational Needs Assessment, one Commissioner expressed concern
that the established standard of 6 acres per 1,000 was high, and recommended a
standard of 3 acres per 1,000 based on comparative standards of local jurisdictions.
The Commission voted in favor of the standard as a goal. As shown in the Assessment,
many communities have high goals, which have not been met to date.
|
|
The County Parks and Recreation Division's role
in this process has been that of facilitator. The Division is not currently charged
with the responsibility of constructing, maintaining, operating, or administering
a neighborhood and community park system in the Mid-Coast area. It is not within
the Division's Mission Statement, or is it within the Division's current capabilities
and resources. Should the Division be redirected to provide or assist with implementing
such a local system, significant new resources (staff, capital, administrative,
etc.) would have to be found and allocated.
|
|
While the County has funded and facilitated this
Assessment, it may be more appropriate for a local entity to implement and manage
this park system. A number of opportunities for partnering with a variety of entities
have also been identified. These opportunities cannot be adequately seized without
an organized and committed resource of experienced personnel. Comparing population
and local interest, the Mid-Coast has much in common with the Half Moon Bay community.
|
|
Staff recommends that the Board of Supervisors
consider establishment of a Task Force to study and recommend the most feasible
entity to govern the system and evaluate funding options. Part of the work of
that Task Force will also be to develop an overall funding strategy to pay for
facilities for the existing population and to develop a funding source to pay
for the cost of operations, maintenance and recreational programming.
|
|
To supplement the work of the task force, staff
has begun work on the analysis of development fees for new residential units as
one of the funding mechanisms to be analyzed. At the Board's October 29, 2002
meeting, you will also hear a presentation of a preliminary proposal regarding
options for such fees. That item is intended to begin a public review process.
|
|