COUNTY OF SAN MATEO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES AGENCY | ||
Date: |
October 28, 2002 | |
Set Time: |
9:30 a.m. | |
Hearing Date: |
November 12, 2002 | |
To: |
Honorable Board of Supervisors | |
From: |
Marcia Raines, Director of Environmental Services | |
Subject: |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Update and Status of an After-the-Fact Tree Removal Permit for trees located at 202 - 11th Street in the unincorporated Montara area of San Mateo County. | |
RECOMMENDATION | ||
Direct the Planning and Building Division to continue the Stop Work Order prohibiting any further work on the proposed new residence. | ||
SUMMARY | ||
This matter is before your Board as a result of a condition you imposed on this project previously, which requires Board approval before canceling the stop work order prohibiting further construction on this property. | ||
On September 12, 2000, your Board considered an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve an "After-the-Fact" Tree Removal Permit for the trimming and removal of one tree located at 202 - 11th Street in the unincorporated Montara area of San Mateo County. Your Board upheld the decision of the Planning Commission to grant the "After-the-Fact" Tree Removal Permit, made the findings and adopted revised conditions of approval (refer to the Notice of Decision attached as Attachment D). | ||
The conditions of approval required the continuance of the Stop Work Order prohibiting any further work on the proposed new residence until the following conditions are met: (1) a planting plan, agreed by the arborist and Planning Director, for the three trees has been implemented; (2) a written report submitted by the arborist verifying that replanting has been carried out under his supervision and in accordance with his recommendations; (3) one full year has transpired since the completion of Items #1 and #2; (4) the submittal of a final arborist's report at the completion of the one-year period on the health of the trees and their future prospects, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director; (5) the Board of Supervisors has met to consider the arborist's reports as well as public testimony on whether the Stop Work Order should be lifted; and (6) the Board, following the hearing in Item #5, above, has voted to lift the Stop Work Order. | ||
Staff has reviewed the final arborist's report and determined that the condition of the trees is unsatisfactory. Staff is of the opinion that Trees #1 and #2 are not in as a healthy state as Tree #3. This conclusion is based on a site inspection conducted on October 16, 2002, by Planning staff. Staff found Trees #1 and #2 to be in a stressed state with extensive die back and the tips of a significant number of branches had been pruned to remove dead wood including the top vertical stem on Tree #2. Staff believes this practice has compromised the growth and vigor of these two trees. | ||
Staff recommends that: (1) the two trees be replaced immediately by a certified arborist; (2) the applicant enter into a contract for maintenance services by a professional arborist for two years; (3) the applicant shall submit quarterly arborist's reports on the health of the trees; and (4) the Board of Supervisors, after one full year has transpired since the completion of Items #1 and #2, above, meet again to consider the arborist's reports as well as public testimony on whether the Stop Work Order should be lifted. |
MR:LT:fc - LLTM1532_WFU.DOC