Board of Supervisors, County of San Mateo, State of California
* * * * * *
Resolution of Intention to Annex Property to the Emerald Lake Heights Sewer Maintenance District (ELHSMD) - Lands of Ferguson - Emerald Lake Hills Area
RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, State of California, acting as the governing board of the Emerald Lake Heights Sewer Maintenance District, that
WHEREAS, this Board has received a request to annex the property in the City of Redwood City to the EMERALD LAKE HEIGHTS SEWER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (District), which property is described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to consider said annexation is required by law.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND ORDERED that
Tuesday, the 6th day of July, 2004, at the hour of 9:15 a.m., at the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Mateo, in the Hall of Justice and Records, 400 County Center (formerly 401 Marshall Street), Redwood City, California, is hereby fixed as the date, time and place of a hearing when and where all persons having any objection to the annexation of said property to said District may be heard.
The Clerk of this Board, pursuant to Section 4860 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code, shall cause a copy of Exhibit "B", attached hereto and made a part hereof, headed by the words "NOTICE OF HEARING", to be published once a week for two successive weeks in the Independent Newspaper Group, a newspaper of general circulation, circulated in said District, and in the territory of the property proposed to be annexed, deemed by this Board to be most likely to give notice of hearing to all the inhabitants of each.
Copies of Exhibit "B" with the heading of "NOTICE OF HEARING" in letters not less than one inch in height shall also be posted in three conspicuous places within the maintenance district to which such property is proposed to be annexed, and three conspicuous places within the territory of the property proposed to be annexed, not less than ten days prior to the day set for the hearing.
* * * * * *