The maximum cost for this project if all contingency funds were to be used, is $130,000. The contingency funds may be used only at the discretion of the County. The contingency may be used to pay DMJM H&N for any unknown or unforeseen work or additional tasks requested by the County after the work is begun. Funding of $100,000 for the study was included within the Special Studies appropriation of the FY 2005-06 Non-Departmental Budget, and will be re-appropriated for FY 2006-07 and increased by $30,000, for a total of $130,000. | |
cc: |
D. Penny Bennett, Deputy County Counsel Sheriff’s RFP Evaluation Committee members |
RFP Summary Table | |
1. General Description of RFP |
Proposals were solicited for jail planning consultants to evaluate the Maple Street Correctional Facilities, including the Women’s Correctional Center. Scope of services included factors contributing to the demand for jail beds, programming needs for female inmates, forecast growth of the female inmate population, evaluation of all of the buildings comprising the Maple Street Correctional Facilities, joint planning with Redwood City and other issues. |
2. Key evaluation criteria |
1) Approach to Study / Firm Philosophy and Professional Values 2) Experience in Completion of Jail Needs Assessments and Design Studies 3) Project Description, Milestones and Deliverables 4) Organizational Capacity of the Firm to Handle the Project 5) Project Costing and Staff Hours |
3. Advertisement and circulation of RFP |
The RFP was sent directly to a list of 32 jail planners and consultants compiled by Sheriff’s staff and other county departments. Additionally, the RFP was posted on the county website. The RFP was also advertised in the San Francisco Chronicle Sunday classified section for 3/12/06. |
4. Total number of RFP’s sent to prospective proposers |
32 RFP’s were mailed out to professional firms |
5. Number of proposals received |
7 proposals were received from DMJM H&N, Jay Farbstein and Associates, KMD Justice, Rosser International, DLR Group, The Institute for Law & Policy Planning and Carter Goble and Lee. |
6. Evaluation Committee |
An evaluation committee consisting of both Sheriff’s office and County Manager’s office employees evaluated all seven proposals. The evaluation committee created a short list for formal interviews that included DMJM H&N, Farbstein and KMD. |