COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Inter-Departmental Correspondence

SHERIFF’S OFFICE

 

DATE:

 

BOARD MEETING DATE:

September 19, 2006

SPECIAL NOTICE/HEARING:

None

VOTE REQUIRED:

Majority

 

TO:

Honorable Board of Supervisors

FROM:

Don Horsley, Sheriff

SUBJECT:

Amendment to the Agreement with South County Fire Authority to provide personnel to staff the County-wide Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Team

 

RECOMMENDATION:

Adopt a resolution authorizing the President of the Board to execute Amendment One to the Agreement with South County Fire Authority (SCFA), aka Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department, for provision of Hazardous Materials Response Services, establishing a relationship between SCFA and the Countywide Emergency Services Joint Powers Authority, and increasing the contract maximum by $119,000 to $740,000.

 

VISION ALIGNMENT:

Commitment: Ensure basic health and safety for all.

Goal 7: Maintain and enhance the public safety of all residents and visitors.

Amendment One ensures the safety and protection of visitors, citizens, and County clients, jurors, patients and customers of County facilities.

 

PERFORMANCE MEASURES:

 

Measure

FY 2005-06
Actual

FY 2006-07 Projected

Total OES Calls for Service

392

365

Annual Fire & Hazmat Incidents – OES Level Response

73

78

Percent of OES Incidents responded to within one hour

99%

100%

 

BACKGROUND:

In 1985, a Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Team (Hazmat) was formed in San Mateo County through a Joint Powers Authority. This is a multi-agency response team comprised of the SCFA, San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division and Sheriff’s Office of Emergency Services (OES), which services all 21 cities and the unincorporated area. The team responds to approximately 80 incidents involving hazardous materials each year. Through the Joint Powers Agreement, half of the Hazardous Materials Emergency Response Program’s budget is paid by the cities. The Solid Waste Fund, legal settlements and responsible party billings make up the remaining half of the budget which represents the County’s contribution. In 1999 and 2001, your Board entered into agreements with the SCFA to provide Hazmat services.

During FY 2005-06, a controversy arose between SCFA and the County, regarding what costs were or should be reimbursable under the Agreement. SCFA maintained that it was operating the program at a financial loss, and could not continue providing services unless some changes were made in the Agreement. The issue was elevated to the Administrative Committee of the countywide Emergency Services Council, composed of the County Manager and four City Managers. A working group was formed composed of County Manager John Maltbie, OES Lieutenant John Quinlan, Sheriff’s Administration and Finance Director Lee Lazaro, and Belmont Finance Director Thomas Fil.

In the ensuing months, the committee met and reached a recommended resolution for ongoing Hazmat service and reimbursement changes, which are reflected in the proposed Amendment. The proposed Amendment was presented to, and approved by both the countywide Emergency Services Council, chaired by Supervisor Rose Jacobs Gibson, and by the SCFA Board, during the summer. Due to meeting schedules of the various boards, and the reorganization of SCFA into the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department, as well as annual budget and year-end responsibilities of key staff involved on all sides, there was a delay in getting the executed Amendment back and in getting the matter agendized for your Board.

 

DISCUSSION:

This is a one-year Amendment representing the last year of an existing three-year Agreement. The plan is for a new Agreement, commencing in July 2007, to be developed for countywide Hazmat services, which will also incorporate the new service and reimbursement provisions listed below. This will be accomplished over the next several months. Given the organizational changes that were underway with the service provider, but not finalized at the time the working group commenced contract negotiations, it was determined that a one-year Amendment to close out the old Agreement and allow time for a new Agreement, with a new JPA or fire agency, to be developed, was the best approach.

Because the original Agreement was with the South County Fire Authority JPA, this Amendment also reflects SCFA as the signatory party, however we have included a provision that allows recognition of the new JPA, the Belmont-San Carlos Fire Department, which has replaced SCFA as a legal entity, but will provide the same countywide Hazmat services.

Finally, it should be noted that the Amendment satisfactorily addresses the concerns and issues of all the parties, on a going-forward basis. It does not directly address any prior-year payment concerns which have been at issue with the parties. However, the Amendment provides a process for SCFA, as a staff agency to the Emergency Services Council, to communicate with the Council directly as regards continued discussion and resolution of any prior-year issues, which results could then be appended by a side letter to the Agreement. Any additional fiscal impact would have to be agreed to by a majority of the countywide Emergency Services Council members.

Amendment One to the Agreement with SCFA accomplishes the following:

    § Increases the contract maximum by $119,000 to $740,000, updating payment in accordance with the proposed FY 2006-07 hazmat budget;

    § Amends the termination clause to establish a minimum six-month termination notification period, and ties any payments to SCFA during a termination to the quarterly budget reimbursement process established later in the Amendment;

    § Allows specific assignability of the Agreement to a potential SCFA successor agency with a different name (ex. “Belmont/San Carlos Fire Department”), provided said agency continues with the same mission, personnel, and general operations as SCFA;

    § Sets forth the specific duties and working responsibilities of the assigned Hazmat Battalion Chief position, which are included as a new Attachment to amended Schedule “A” of the Agreement. Duties include certain staff responsibilities to the Emergency Services Council JPA, as relates to hazmat fire response services;

    § Sets forth the County’s role to provide annual budgetary support and consultation for development of the annual Hazmat emergency response, in coordination with SCFA fiscal staff;

    § Establishes the annual Emergency Services Council JPA budgetary process as the vehicle through which the SCFA hazmat response reimbursement under the Agreement will be developed, specified, budgeted, and approved in the future;

    § Sets forth in detail the specific components to be included in both the annual operating budget, and the capital equipment budget, and establishes parameters for these costs by way of percentage relationships;

    § Sets forth the requirements for a narrative document to accompany the annual budget, to be prepared by SCFA management, which discusses key budget issues; changes in the proposed budget; and provides some key workload and performance data (to be determined mutually) and can in turn be incorporated into the overall Emergency Services Council Annual Budget document process;

    § Revises the invoice & payment process to be a straight-forward quarterly invoice against the adopted SCFA portion of the JPA Hazmat budget, submitted in even quarterly invoices at the beginning of the last month in each quarter, with payment by the County within 30 days of receipt;

    § Establishes a definition of, and procedure to be followed for SCFA to seek remedy, in the event of a catastrophic, or “extraordinary (Hazmat) event” which results in SCFA incurring response costs that are clearly, and by specific definition, above and beyond the planned budgeted level of expenditures; and

    § Establishes that any other costs or reimbursements not otherwise incorporated must be mutually agreed to by the County, SCFA, and the Emergency Services Council, and documented by a side letter.

County Counsel has reviewed and approved the Resolution and Amendment as to legal form.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

Funding for the ongoing impact of the Amendment changes was anticipated and included in the FY 2006-07 Countywide Emergency Services JPA Budget, which was subsequently approved by the Emergency Services JPA Council and adopted by the Board. Future Emergency Services JPA budgets will also include an updated cost for countywide hazardous materials response services.

If it is the desire of the Emergency Services Council to meet with SCFA in the future, for the purpose of reviewing and reaching some resolution on SCFA claims for prior year services under the Agreement, any financial impact from adjustments resulting from that process are not included in the Emergency Services JPA budget presently. The Council would have to first vote to assess the JPA members for any such cost, under the existing JPA cost-sharing formula, and if approved, then Council members would need to go back to their respective City Councils or Board, and also review financing options for their agency’s share of the increased cost, with their respective City or County Manager.