Performance Measure(s): |
Measure FY 2007-08 Estimated FY 2008-09 Target FY 2009-10 Target FY 2010-11 Target Absence of recurrence of maltreatment within 6 months 94%* 94%* 94%* 94%* |
*Reflects the State’s requirements for all counties in California. |
BACKGROUND: |
DR is a county-wide evidence-based early intervention strategy designed to improve outcomes for children and families. DR offers multiple paths for ensuring child safety. Path 1 or Community Partner Response is selected when the assessment of the case is such that there is low risk of harm to child, but child appears safe. Path 2 or Joint Response is selected when assessment of the case is such that there is low to moderate risk of harm to children. Path 3 or Children and Family Services (CFS) Response is selected when assessment of the case is such that there is moderate to high risk of harm to a child. |
On February 4, 2008, the Human Services Agency (HSA) issued a Request for Proposal (please see attached RFP Matrix) for DR case management for North, Central and South Regions of San Mateo County for FYs 2008-11. In this RFP, the DR priority is to provide more intensive evidence-based services to those families who are significantly impacted. By providing intensive DR case management to families with children 0-5 years of age and/or families where abuse/neglect has been substantiated, CFS will be able to maximize the available resources and direct DR services to the most vulnerable populations in our community. |
DISCUSSION: |
This three-year Agreement with DCPPC is to provide DR to the Northern Region of San Mateo County using an evidence-based home visiting model and establish strength-based working relationship with families. DCPPC will also work collaboratively with community-based organizations so that families can easily access resources and ensure continuum of care after case closure. DR services will be provided by culturally and linguistically competent staff to work with San Mateo County’s diverse population. |
The Contractor has assured compliance with the County's Contractor Employee Jury Service Ordinance, as well as all other contract provisions that are required by County ordinance and administrative memoranda, including but not limited to insurance, hold harmless, non-discrimination and equal benefits. County Counsel has approved this Agreement as to form and Risk Management has approved the Contractor’s insurance. |
FISCAL IMPACT: |
The term of this Agreement is July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2011. The total obligation is $1,572,105 and is fully funded with Child Welfare Services Outcome Improvement Project Funds. There is no Net County Cost. Appropriation has been included FY 2008-09 Recommended Budget and will be included in the FY 2009-10 and FY 2010-11 Recommended Budgets. |
1. |
General Description of RFP |
Differential Response Case Management |
2. |
List key evaluation criteria |
Proposals were evaluated based on the following: • Individual or agency qualifications including organizational and financial viability • Ability to serve the identified population based on needs assessment • Coverage of the geographical area • Project design • Collaboration with other agencies • Agency capacity • Cost effectiveness of the program and budget • Past program performance |
3. |
Where advertised |
a. Examiner North and South on February 6, 2008 |
4. |
In addition to any advertisement, list others to whom RFP was sent |
Over 200 non-profit organizations and mailing lists for the following organizations: a. CCAT b. Community Information Program c. ACAT d. First 5
|
5. |
Total number sent to prospective proposers |
13 |
6. |
Number of proposals received |
3 |
7. |
Who evaluated the proposals |
a. Ronell Reyna, Family Health Program Manager, Health Services b. Rhonda Ceccato, Executive Director, Sitike Counseling Center c. Gary Beasley, Program Manager, Human Services Agency |
