Exhibit A
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS MATRIX
1. |
General description of RFP |
Contract services for tobacco cessation and education activities |
2. |
List key evaluation criteria |
• Project Description |
• Applicant Capability | ||
• Coordination of Effort and Community Support | ||
• Scope of Work and Budget | ||
• Project Need Demonstrated | ||
3. |
Where advertised |
San Mateo County Times |
4. |
In addition to any advertisement, list others to whom the RFP announcement was sent |
Notice emailed to the Tobacco Education Coalition as well as a listing of previous contractors and list of AOD providers |
5. |
Total number of RFP’s sent to prospective proposers |
34 |
6. |
Number of proposals received |
13, 3 for cessation, 3 for smoke-free events/venues, 2 for innovative ideas, 2 for media consultant, 2 for evaluation consultant, 1 for enforcement |
7. |
Who evaluated the proposals |
The review committee consisted of individuals from: |
American Cancer Society | ||
Kaiser Permanente | ||
Human Services Agency | ||
Youth Leadership Institute | ||
San Francisco Health Department | ||
8. |
In names of proposers (or finalists, if applicable) and location |
Cessation Services: American Lung Association, Emeryville, CA, |
Exhibit B
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS MATRIX
1. |
General description of RFP |
Contract services for a public education campaign to combat the promotion of youth tobacco use through depictions of smoking in films. |
2. |
List key evaluation criteria |
• Project Description |
• Applicant Capability | ||
• Coordination of Effort and Community Support | ||
• Scope of Work and Budget | ||
• Project Need Demonstrated | ||
3. |
Where advertised |
San Mateo County Times |
4. |
In addition to any advertisement, list others to whom the RFP announcement was sent |
Notice emailed to the Tobacco Education Coalition as well as a listing of previous contractors and community contacts |
5. |
Total number of RFP’s sent to prospective proposers |
7 |
6. |
Number of proposals received |
6 in total, 1 for “tobacco in films” campaign, 3 for sales law enforcement, 2 for youth access to tobacco education work |
7. |
Who evaluated the proposals |
The review committee consisted of individuals from: |
8. |
In names of proposers (or finalists, if applicable) and location |
Breathe California, Daly City, CA |