Exhibit A to Board Memo
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS MATRIX
AUGUST 2008
1. |
General description of RFP |
RFP to solicit providers to offer Experiential Independent Living Skills courses to ILP youth, ranging from High School Freshmen to Seniors. |
2. |
List key evaluation criteria |
Evaluation criteria included agency qualifications, ability to serve identified population, project description, evidence of collaboration, agency capacity, and cost effectiveness of the program and budget. |
3. |
Where advertised |
San Mateo Daily Journal (North and South) |
4. |
In addition to any advertisement, list others to whom the RFP announcement was sent |
RFP Distribution mailing list comprised of 225 providers. |
5. |
Total number of RFP’s sent to prospective proposers |
Seven |
6. |
Number of proposals received |
One |
7. |
Who evaluated the proposals |
1. Ellen Bucci, Program Manager 2. Marion Liberona, ILP Coordinator 3. Marsha Beaman, Social Work Supervisor |
8. |
In alphabetical order, names of proposers (or finalists, if applicable) and location |
1. Walden School |
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS MATRIX
JANUARY 2009
1. |
General description of RFP |
RFP to solicit providers to offer Experiential Independent Living Skills courses to ILP youth, ranging from High School Freshmen to Seniors. |
2. |
List key evaluation criteria |
Evaluation criteria included agency qualifications, ability to serve identified population, project description, evidence of collaboration, agency capacity, and cost effectiveness of the program and budget. |
3. |
Where advertised |
San Mateo Daily Journal (North and South) |
4. |
In addition to any advertisement, list others to whom the RFP announcement was sent |
RFP Distribution mailing list comprised of 225 providers. |
5. |
Total number of RFP’s sent to prospective proposers |
Five |
6. |
Number of proposals received |
One |
7. |
Who evaluated the proposals |
1. Ellen Bucci, Program Manager 2. Sarah Gregg, Foster Parent Liaison 3. Lisa Randall, Human Services Analyst |
8. |
In alphabetical order, names of proposers (or finalists, if applicable) and location |
1. Silicon Valley Community Foundation |