FISCAL IMPACT: |
The term of the Agreement is July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2013. The total obligation of this Agreement is $285,000, of which, 100% is funded by state revenue. Funds have been included in the FY 2010-11 Adopted Budget and will be included in the FY 2011-12 and FY 2012-13 Recommended Budgets. There is no Net County Cost. |
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL PROCESS MATRIX
1. |
General description of RFP |
Human Services Agency requested proposals from nonprofit agencies to provide an array of services for a continuum of care that would be comprised of child abuse prevention and intervention and/or family support and stability programs. The ultimate goal of these programs and services is to provide assistance to at-risk families before children are abused and neglected in order to support the stabilization of families and maintenance of children in their homes. An emphasis is to provide services that shall be culturally and linguistically appropriate to the population served. |
2. |
List key evaluation criteria |
Needs; Licensure; Agency qualifications; Ability to serve the populations; Strategies; Budget and costs. |
3. |
Where advertised |
A funding alert was mailed to numerous nonprofit agencies as a means of informing interested applicants of the RFP opportunity. The funding alert established that the RFP could be e-mailed or mailed to interested applicants. Interested applicants also were provided with the choice of picking up the RFP in person. The funding alert also indicated that the RFP would be posted on the CCAT website. Finally, an announcement of the release of the RFP was also sent to nonprofit agencies through the County’s Community Information Program (CIP) E-Blast. |
4. |
In addition to any advertisement, list others to whom the RFP announcement was sent |
Refer to item number 3 for specific details |
5. |
Total number of RFP’s sent to prospective proposers |
222 nonprofit agencies as well as numerous nonprofit agencies who receive the County’s CIP E-Blast. |
6. |
Number of proposals received |
13 proposals were received. |
7. |
Who evaluated the proposals |
a.) Becky Arredondo, Program Manager, Human Services Agency b.) Pat Miljanich, Executive Director, Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) c.) Mary Hansell, Director, Family Health Services Department d.) Marissa Saludes, Management Analyst, Human Services Agency e.) Shawneece Stevenson, Prevention Program Supervisor, Golden Gate Regional Center |
8. |
In alphabetical order, names of proposers (or finalists, if applicable) and location |
a.) Cabrillo Unified School District (Half Moon Bay) b.) Community Legal Services in EPA (East Palo Alto) c.) Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse (CORA) (San Mateo) d.) Daly City Peninsula Partnership – Our Second Home (Daly City) e.) Family & Children Services (Palo Alto) through Partnership with Institute for Human & Social Development (South San Francisco) f.) Family Connections (Redwood City) g.) Friends for Youth (Redwood City) h.) Institute for Human & Social Development (South San Francisco) i.) National Tongan Pacific American Office (San Mateo) j.) Peninsula Conflict Resolution Center (San Mateo) k.) Peninsula Family YMCA (San Mateo) in Collaboration with Samaritan House (San Mateo) – CHAMPS (Community Helping Adults Manage Parenting Stress) l.) Puente de la Costa Sur (Pescadero) m.) Redwood City School District (Redwood City) |